Re: Standard MTU for SJFs and support for MEF 3.0 AI payloads

Mark Tinka via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <[email protected]> 

On 09/03/2026 22:48, Majdi S. Abbas via NANOG wrote:
> 	* It's probably also worth noting that as long as equipment
> vendors only support N nested tags/labels, additional MTU might not be
> a huge help by itself.

I tend to agree.

I don't think there is any practical utility in raising the jumbo frame 
MTU by MEF's new standards given not only the current state of 
equipment, but also, the current state of MTU operations in the 
Internet's networks.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3YM5DZOTVAXYODGMAZ4T6E7VR62QJOR4/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.