Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers
Joe via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+zb_vFa-ehH1g+U2UrVKZbn1oFgOUPjWThoaVU3McCsEofcWQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Rather obvious would be security devices such as Firewalls missing in all of this. Brings to mind, it's not a router, it's a broken firewall.... lol -Joe On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 4:21 AM Barry Raveendran Greene via NANOG < [email protected]> wrote: > > > This applies to all operators in the US. I crafted this up today just to > confirm what remember of CPE supply chain. > > https://www.senki.org/operators-security-toolkit/us-isp-cpe-supply-chain/ > > I don't see how this is going to work. Other parts of the world are doing > sane CPE security policies > > > > On Mar 24, 2026, at 20:15, Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > The National Security Determination ( > > https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/NSD-Routers0326.pdf ) on this > > gives the game away quite clearly. > > > > To facilitate this transition period, entities that produce routers in a > >> foreign country are encouraged to apply for Conditional Approvals > (Annex A) > >> which, if approved, will allow such producers to continue to receive FCC > >> authorization for their products while they work to address the U.S. > >> government’s national security concerns described above. > > > > > > You can reliably predict that companies will be granted their conditional > > approvals quickly after making a 'donation' to a presidential library > fund > > or other associated entity, because that's basically the primary function > > of the US government at this point. > > > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 2:17 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Relevant URLs are > >> > >> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-420034A1.pdf > >> https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist > >> > >> 'Routers^ produced in a foreign country, except routers which have > >> been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS.' > >> > >> I wonder what 'Routers^' are 'produced' in the US, in such a way that > >> it meaningfully improves security posture. > >> > >>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 at 07:54, Roy via NANOG <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> FCC issues rules about sales of routers and such not made in the us > >>> > >>> > >> > https://www.marketscreener.com/news/us-regulator-bans-imports-of-new-foreign-made-routers-citing-security-concerns-ce7e5eddda88f226 > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> NANOG mailing list > >>> > >> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RX6CEDE5LQZUPUIKQDIANG5WQOOABSZS/ > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ++ytti > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NANOG mailing list > >> > >> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LAMH3C2BVWRTSCOBWQBBZNUMFOCOHG3X/ > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > NANOG mailing list > > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2ERGLTTYJXZYYNF6P2UDE5YLMCGLCFF4/ > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GQC2NH7K3KE636IHPDKRR3NS2YIBADSC/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AADAJQCQ4BVNSF2JGVA6GDRY3VQFXEUU/