Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers
Christopher Morrow via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9jLaY5tcTh1LZpkedwZz5GgeNhO1B9MByxvy_SnVhE14zx8A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 3:14 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > The National Security Determination ( > https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/NSD-Routers0326.pdf ) on this > gives the game away quite clearly. > > To facilitate this transition period, entities that produce routers in a > > foreign country are encouraged to apply for Conditional Approvals (Annex A) > > which, if approved, will allow such producers to continue to receive FCC > > authorization for their products while they work to address the U.S. > > government’s national security concerns described above. > > > You can reliably predict that companies will be granted their conditional > approvals quickly after making a 'donation' to a presidential library fund > or other associated entity, because that's basically the primary function > of the US government at this point. Library fund note aside, didn't India attempt a similar lockdown/process for equipment used to operate networks in India ~7 yr back? Whatever happened to that I wonder? _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XRDMJGOTLNRQBNQSMB4N7B6AIDNPE4ND/