Re: How much do you automate your automation?
Andrew Latham via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+qj4S8o3rPcXBE7FdGUQcBXCrVfsj0avvv_W5ykL56vPa7BPQ@mail.gmail.com> |
TL;DR; Some organizations have full copy/versions of their stack in offline mode for testing. e.g. https://docs.gns3.com/docs/ There are many slices of the pie.....mmmm pie.... * Known good systems/devices * Known legacy systems/devices * Unknown systems/devices * 3rdparty systems/devices * (other slices here) 1. To automate the automation of your systems you need to understand that some systems from all slices will have a no-change verbal rule set based on an existing long term ticket with no resolution. 2. MOP/SOP/Playbooks should list the systems/devices that CAN be operated on. 3. A breakglass user or access method MUST exist. Some/many styems/devices/teams DO NOT support breakglass. 4. (insert other deep thoughts) On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 1:36 PM Jon Lewis via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been told that at [some of] the largest networks, network engineers > "never directly log into network devices". This implies that all > configuration changes made to and insights gleaned from the network gear > are done via some form of automation. > > I assume it's commonplace to have/use Unix CLI tools for executing > configuration changes. I've written such things for the past couple of > places I've worked so that we can literally copy&paste from a MOP to a > shell session and have a change implemented. Such tools become > extremely handy when you want to make the same change on a few or a few > hundred devices. > > What I'm wondering is, how common is it to take the next logical step and > if you have a planned maintenance window to implement some simple change, > do you have an engineer manually make that change, manually execute a > script that implements the change, or use old-school automation (at) to > schedule a date & time at which the script that implements the change will > be run, and optionally have an engineer monitor that the change happened > and had the intended results? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > Blue Stream Fiber, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/WKX5XT2LSEL4T3ZGFGRG7Q3KUAR54LVA/ -- - Andrew "lathama" Latham - _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/Z5CCCO27FNQ6UULECKE5RBXTBKPEVBHX/