Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <CAGPjif8G1MY5sXG1M8PxpqzgRr_AbYvpMaxgWvopFSfrWFtg-w@mail.gmail.com>
Saku

You think you can type into an llm build a better protocol and it will snap
one out of the air.

But do you think you should build an ietf standard in 2026 with out llm.

If your not using llm everyday your competitors are.

But further to my problem what else do i need to solve.

I solved route growth as peering is now optional,
Vpns by making vpn over quic
And best path by cost factor.

Anything else need to be fixed?



On Thu., Apr. 30, 2026, 3:25 a.m. Saku Ytti, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> not being polite, you're enabling.
>
> Stop supporting this LLM psychosis.
>
> --
>   ++ytti
>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AKF4M2DQLS3JAF3MIAEYJK7DOOTNTBCP/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.