Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just some of my motivation for IPv8. 

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 11:03 AM Jamie Thain <[email protected]> wrote:

> Saku, 
> 
> I am not those people. I've written hundreds of thousands of lines of code.
> 
> 1. Assess the issue. Its in the IETF posting (have you read it) 
>     1.1 100% compatible segments with current IPv4 networks 
>     1.2 It must be an inplace upgrade. 
>     1.3 It must be more manageable, Oauth configuration and Important
> Telemetry 
>     1.4 No new Silicon to get near wire speed. 
>     1.5 Fix BGP cost factor, to deprecate OSPF and ISIS 
>     1.6 No user impact. 
>     1.7 Solve the corporate issues including 
>         1.7.1 East West Security
>         1.7.2 North South Security
>         1.7.3 Area addressess ( ASN = 127.x.x.x) 16 million networks of 4 B
> addresses. 
>     1.8 Make it easy to implement. 
>     1.9 Routing issues -- valid routes route tables to big, peering too
> complext. 
> 
> 2. Design where I am write now, publish Assess the IETF document and work on
> Design. If you don't want to help don't hit reply. 
>     
>     What I am currently working on is peering and routing inside the ASN
> without impacting silicon. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 6:46 AM Saku Ytti <[email protected] [[email protected]]> wrote:
> 
> 
> > LLM produces code much much faster than you can review it.
> > 
> > This argument worked in days of yore, when the person writing the code
> > had to put in orders of magnitude more work in that person reviewing
> > it.
> > 
> > Anyone maintaining any open source project has seen this, massive
> > complicated pull requests from people who cannot code and have strong
> > expectations that you review it. They spent minutes generating it,
> > you'll spend days reviewing it.
> > 
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 at 12:34, Izaac via NANOG <[email protected]
> > [[email protected]]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:03:34PM -0500, Jamie Thain via NANOG wrote:
> > > > I'd appreciate your thoughts on it
> > >
> > > Got code?
> > >
> > > --
> > > . ___ ___  .   .  ___
> > > .  \    /  |\  |\ \
> > > .  _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NANOG mailing list
> > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/
> > message/6YSXKTNRAE646GVCUUXZBITFIK2OIGNU/
> > [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6YSXKTNRAE646GVCUUXZBITFIK2OIGNU/]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> >   ++ytti
> 
> []
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XFWF3ADRICSHWPKB3B5QVDRJLX3UWH6J/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.