Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Christopher Morrow via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9jLaajf5fMvfeXDJ6LheqPBTHU5O30LBWKrUA-Ahq-oj_Xjw@mail.gmail.com> |
I hadn't seen anyone note (in this forum) that the proposal here is:
1) already stepping on a proposal which got closed out ~25 yrs (or more?) ago
<can't find jim fleming's draft, sorry, though we are all better
off for not finding it?>
2) that this smells an awful lot like 8+8 GSE ->
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipngwg-gseaddr-00
(hey mo!)
probably sometime in the future another IPNGWG will get spun up, but
that day's not today.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > not being polite, you're enabling.
>
>
> Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback and
> collaborating.
I read SOME of the replies from the author as ...
computer-person-computer-personing...
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VMLM25NA4R7FT42A2OUQGW3LLEOIDY7A/