Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGPjif8ZMvQELuMwxhg=da1xfORa_VuOPOOjTZy4sujqR-EeHw@mail.gmail.com> |
Mikael And what isn't backwards compatible if you know of something. I'm all ears. Jamie On Sat., May 2, 2026, 6:18 a.m. Mikael Abrahamsson, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 May 2026, Jamie Thain wrote: > > > Ipv10 Was A dual stack idea. > > Everything that isn't IPv4 will be a new stack. This was realised already > in the 90s, and that's why we have IPv6 that's now close to 30 years into > its deployment. Adding another stack in the mix won't help. > > If you would have done what you're doing back in mid 90s, it might have > helped. You're 3 decades too late. > > > Again since you can't do the analysis steps then just send me a tape > > recording. > > There is nothing to analyze. You're proposing something that isn't > backwards compatible, and you don't seem to understand this is what you're > proposing. Same as IPv10 guy. > > So start implementing, you might understand it then. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/Z4YOGRDCPBOG5SGSQPC4A3FDICSYLJYB/