Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marco, Here's how I see it going. 1. The OS upgrade is transparent. 2. The firewalls at the edge upgrade and IPv8 zone features. 3. The 10.x can now be split and operated by area. 4. People turn that on, and Zone Server to interoperate better inside regardless of the Internet status. 5. Internally it becomes part of the OS. 6. Even just implementing a Zone Server, and let people manage 10.x by area will be a great option. Jamie On Sat, May 2, 2026 at 10:08 AM Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 02.05.26 um 14:56 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: > > And what isn't backwards compatible if you know of something. I'm all ears. > > Your proposal isn't too, as there is nothing that can be backwards > compatible regarding IPv4-only nodes in an IPv4-only environment with > admins who do not want any change. > > -- > Gruß > Marco > Muell und Spam bitte an [email protected] > [[email protected]] > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/ > message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/ > [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/] [] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EFFNMZI24ECZ2ECCV2WRM7DOTSH2R2QS/