Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

And how will you update the myriad of operating systems and embedded devices which haven’t received updates in years but are still running inside enterprises?



> On May 2, 2026, at 6:43 PM, Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Marco,
> 
> Here's how I see it going. 
> 
> 1. The OS upgrade is transparent. 
> 2. The firewalls at the edge upgrade and IPv8 zone features.  
> 3. The 10.x can now be split and operated by area. 
> 4. People turn that on, and Zone Server to interoperate better inside regardless
> of the Internet status. 
> 5. Internally it becomes part of the OS. 
> 6. Even just implementing a Zone Server, and let people manage 10.x by area will
> be a great option. 
> 
> Jamie 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sat, May 2, 2026 at 10:08 AM Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 02.05.26 um 14:56 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG:
>>> And what isn't backwards compatible if you know of something. I'm all ears.
>> 
>> Your proposal isn't too, as there is nothing that can be backwards
>> compatible regarding IPv4-only nodes in an IPv4-only environment with
>> admins who do not want any change.
>> 
>> --
>> Gruß
>> Marco
>> Muell und Spam bitte an [email protected]
>> [[email protected]]
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/
>> message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/
>> [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VKXJGPM2V5GFQ4I6EYJETEEQKIP32D4G/]
> 
> []
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EFFNMZI24ECZ2ECCV2WRM7DOTSH2R2QS/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FS5HUHMNBYTBPTC5DRDXZG44YWLLARY3/