Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: > > * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled the > address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery, > autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling. That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how it is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP. It is there and works. Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that needs to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/