Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Kevin Tillery via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jamie And ipv8 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv6. I appreciate your input. Kevin On 4 May 2026 08:26:33 CEST, Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: >Marco > >And ipv6 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv4. > >I appreciate your input. > >Jamie > >On Sun., May 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. Marco Moock via NANOG, < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: >> > >> > * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled the >> > address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery, >> > autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling. >> >> That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare >> and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how it >> is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP. It >> is there and works. >> >> Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that needs >> to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented. >> >> -- >> Gruß >> Marco >> >> Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> NANOG mailing list >> >> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/ >_______________________________________________ >NANOG mailing list >https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AVIU5UM7TNRP7DARNQCQXX6EVBJRANVR/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MPYN6YGEZCGL5ZH6Z4BLZMUWBEU3SXEV/