Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

You must not deal with very many corporations because I know many that have
added v6 to their corporate networks. Think of many in the top 200
companies in the US.

Shane

On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 6:28 PM Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Kevin,
>
> I can't fix ipv6 I'll leave that to people that understand the basics.
>
> No one, and i mean no one in corp (that's not a super scalar) knows
> anything about ipv6 and no one and i mean no one cares.
>
> They know it's on in there os and there's some mystery that some things
> will break if it's off.
>
> Jamie
>
> On Mon., May 4, 2026, 2:27 p.m. Kevin Tillery via NANOG, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Jamie
> >
> > And ipv8 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv6.
> >
> > I appreciate your input.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > On 4 May 2026 08:26:33 CEST, Jamie Thain via NANOG <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >Marco
> > >
> > >And ipv6 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv4.
> > >
> > >I appreciate your input.
> > >
> > >Jamie
> > >
> > >On Sun., May 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. Marco Moock via NANOG, <
> > >[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG:
> > >> >
> > >> >   * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled
> the
> > >> >     address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery,
> > >> >     autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling.
> > >>
> > >> That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare
> > >> and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how
> it
> > >> is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP.
> It
> > >> is there and works.
> > >>
> > >> Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that
> needs
> > >> to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Gruß
> > >> Marco
> > >>
> > >> Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected]
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> NANOG mailing list
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >NANOG mailing list
> > >
> >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AVIU5UM7TNRP7DARNQCQXX6EVBJRANVR/
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> >
> >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MPYN6YGEZCGL5ZH6Z4BLZMUWBEU3SXEV/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SGDZ4RYZSMBWEGOG36DHRV5W3O465YWK/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ABKATN6CSOA55JOI326QUM4XUY5NLQUK/