Re: "Peering Router"
Mark Tinka via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/05/2026 22:12, Seth Mattinen via NANOG wrote: > > I personally don't mix transit and peering duties on the same device. > I have a dedicated router for peering sessions and a dedicated router > for each transit provider. I find it easier to manage and it limits > scope if one of them has a problem or needs an update since it only > affects its own playground. This. A dedicated peering router also ensures you eliminate providing transit to a peer if you make a configuration error, as the peering router neither carries the DFZ nor 0/0, ::/0. Mark. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XKAEPSAWJDU67EDCJJLQLINP4ISWRWSM/