Regarding the BGP leak
me via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom, Thanks for your perspective. I do appreciate the Hanlon's Razor point — it's a good general principle. However, in this case, the same ASN also: - Manually injected China Telecom's IPv6 backbone (`240e::/20`) into its BIRD config on May 1 - Submitted a new ASN (`AS402333`) on May 16, the day of the leak - Maintains a global geofeed that still lists a Shanghai node as of May 22 If that's not malice, then perhaps it's a very, very advanced form of stupidity. Either way, the evidence is archived. me _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RQHULVRN22K4PLHAY66I33733WOAO3MF/