Re: IPv4 flag day
Brian Knight via NANOG <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:53:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-06-16 01:33, Saku Ytti via NANOG wrote: > Does anyone feel responsibility for the dual stack mess we've created? > It wasn't here when we found the Internet, and we're going to leave it > here after we leave, does not really jive with the whole leave > campground cleaner than found it ethos. It was the most comprehensive solution for the NAT problem. But NAT became the accepted way we connect to the Internet. World + dog knows how to connect to it, troubleshoot it, look at NAT tables on their edge firewall or router. Is NAT still such a severe problem that we needed a different protocol? Ask 1000 NANOG engineers, get 1000 different answers. In practice, no. IPv4 still works. Economics are a slightly different story, but so far, IPv4 space isn't prohibitively expensive. -Brian _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QEOMV5GN4WLNYOH7QZWYP5E26ZJ5AO57/