Re: IPv4 flag day
Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:11:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 18.06.26 um 16:42 schrieb William Herrin: > I'm almost never looking for a stateful packet inspector that isn't > doing NAT. Stateful gives it most of the same drawbacks of NAT > without the benefit of making my internal network inaddressible from > outside. But YMMV: a lot of folks don't have the comfort level with > stateless packet filters that I do, and SPIs do offer some additional > protection to hosts intended to be reached from the Internet. If you really want, you can combine SPI firewalling with NAT66 (1:1 matching if you want). For me, NAT and the aspect that the machines are not addressable from the outside is a large disadvantage. I do whatever I can with IPv6. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MDZP77OG5ZDCV6TWIAIXNCUZYDDHYYIF/