Re: IPv4 flag day
David Conrad via NANOG <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Jun 2026 06:14:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 19, 2026, at 12:19 PM, Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2026 at 11:32, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: >> "Big tech shops” buying up all the addresses would drive the asset value up, increasing the likelihood the beancounters will see incentives to migrate. > It is an irrelevant cost to them. There is more value to them that competitors cannot have them. Hence antitrust. I was speaking of SMBs. They might (historically were, in my experience) be interested in the asset sale, particularly as they moved to the cloud/SAAS and defensively reduced their public Internet exposure. > Free market won't fix the problem we created. I have some skepticism that a “turn off IPv4 day” mandate from (some) network operators will change things significantly, but I’m frequently wrong. Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KEEQGLAHKT5LGXR67Q44V5ICVVTRFYIP/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 322 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wqsEARYIAF0Fgmo2L84JEFUfxYQVzOyUNRQAAAAAABwAEHNhbHRAbm90YXRp b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmciJnVjQS64iH2tpyVRcMJwFiEEWiQXDMHiZNYY voSOVR/FhBXM7JQAAN5gAP9+paK0vP6pcC+mxW3RYbuEULdwkRuyXEu85giu iglG1wEAr1xur5DTocJbu5U4eANmhp9PW7o4Yt7Bz4TUThkw2QY= =KNb8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----