Re: LAG/ECMP and 'exact-route'
Pedro Prado via NANOG <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jun 2026 07:11:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB-iU8YndvK4d+8L69_6Caq7TkieskseZPdsrMgK1fn7=07crA@mail.gmail.com> |
Arista does have a command that does exactly this (?) *Pedro Martins Prado* [email protected] / +353 83 036 1875 (FaceTime & WhatsApp) On Mon 22 Jun 2026 at 16:49, James Bensley via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12th, 2025 at 16:59, Saku Ytti via NANOG < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey-o, > > > > > > > > Which platform/software has a command to show which interface will be > > used for forwarding with given keys? > > > > > ASR9k has a cef exec-route, and I see references to this in c-nsp, > > reddit and cisco.com forums, stressing how useful debugging tool it > > has been. Despite it not actually working, since it's just RE > > software, it doesn't talk to the EZchip/lightspeed, unless it has been > > fixed in the past couple of years, certainly hasn't worked in the > > timeline of various forums finding it useful. > > > > > MX has 'jsim' > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/day-one-books/TW_MX3D_PacketWalkthrough.pdf > > which I think actually works, but it is quite involved. I have some > > (false?) memory that I saw in some release note this being a bit more > > productised into CLI command, but I'm failing to find anything to > > support this memory. > > > > > There is also RFC5837, which is actually implemented in QFX5k, but not > > for TTL exceeded, we've opened ER to get it supported on MX and PTX > > and for TTL exceeded. This RFC will allow programmatic platform > > agnostic discovery of the actual interface used, without relying on > > platform specific magic. So please do ask your vendors to implement > > it. > > > After much a-do I managed to get this working on Jericho2 + Arista EOS > boxes by using the Broadcom debug tools i.e. craft any packet you want and > inject it into the ASIC, and then capture the ASIC lookup result. > > These are my notes for version 1.0 so it's a bit rough, but works. I'm > sure it can be improved upon: > https://null.53bits.co.uk/index.php?page=7280r3-diag-packet-tx > > Cheers, > James._______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/YB5IW53XGT2HUCIETTTJER6T23TAPTGI/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QR4KC4BQNA2XF55O4FMHPYV3M3ZNPBTA/