Re: New DNS vulnerability: political overreach
"John R. Levine via NANOG" <[email protected]> 28 Jul 2026 13:44:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 28 Jul 2026, Tom Beecher wrote: > Now, if this Texas action sticks as precedent, any **alleged** violation of > ANY US law ( federal / state / local / territorial) allows a court to issue > an order to take your domain down if it's from a US registry. Which of > course opens the door to non-US registries doing the same things (if they > aren't already), and everything just gets more fragmented and stupid. > > I applaud all the legal professionals who fight to prevent this stupidity. > Truly underappreciated. Once again, this takedown was a screwup due to the target not responding to the suit and the court accepting all the assertions in the complaint, because that's what courts do when a defendant doesn't reply. It's not a precedent in any meaningful sense other than "don't do that." R's, John _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XP4DX2TOKERXXJTEQB5O2X766AXNXMDV/