Re: AS6939 (Hurricane Electric) packet loss on Helsinki/Piter-IX-bound path; Lagos, Nigeria origin
Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9Qcx7vWtNAdi_AW8tJb4h4A+LDW9j5QNNOWo1sWE9-sHWWFg@mail.gmail.com> |
[email protected] On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:33 AM Sina Owolabi via NANOG < [email protected]> wrote: > Apparently Ive not particpated at the list in a while. > > cordially yours, > > Sina Owolabi > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Sina Owolabi <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 3:30 PM > Subject: AS6939 (Hurricane Electric) packet loss on Helsinki/Piter-IX-bound > path; Lagos, Nigeria origin > To: [email protected] list <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, < > [email protected]> > > > > Hi all, > > Sorry to bother you but we need some help > > We're seeing sustained, real packet loss inside Hurricane Electric's own > network (AS6939) on a > path from Lagos, Nigeria toward Helsinki. > Loss starts at the first HE hop and persists all the way > to the destination (a Hetzner Helsinki host we're trying to reach over a > site-to-site IPsec > tunnel). Confirmed via RDAP that the lossy hops are HE-registered space > (org handle HURC), not > just transiting through HE — this is on your own backbone, not further > upstream. > > This is *not* a blanket HE issue from our vantage point: the same test > toward RIPE NCC in > Amsterdam, through the same HE hops (184.105.65.2 and neighbors), shows 0% > loss. > > A test toward a Debian mirror (via Fastly) shows only minor loss (13-23%) > on a couple of intermediate HE hops and > 0% at the destination. So this looks specific to the segment continuing > toward the Piter-IX > Helsinki peering, not HE generally. > > mtr -n -r -i 1.5 -c 30 -s 300 run from our edge in Lagos (source > 62.173.32.54) to a Hetzner > Helsinki host (packet size/interval chosen to avoid ICMP rate-limit false > positives): > > HOST Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst > StDev > 62.173.32.49 0.0% 30 0.4 0.7 0.4 4.1 > 0.9 > 62.173.34.225 0.0% 30 0.5 0.6 0.4 2.5 > 0.4 > 41.184.211.32 0.0% 30 0.9 1.3 0.7 5.0 > 1.0 > 41.184.56.17 0.0% 30 93.3 92.0 91.3 98.9 > 1.5 > 62.173.35.222 0.0% 30 91.5 91.7 91.3 94.6 > 0.7 > 184.105.65.2 0.0% 30 99.3 98.7 98.3 102.6 > 0.8 > 184.104.192.133 26.7% 30 100.1 101.1 99.1 104.3 > 1.3 <- HE (AS6939) > 184.104.188.218 36.7% 30 199.2 142.4 129.9 201.0 > 25.5 <- HE (AS6939) > 184.104.198.57 36.7% 30 187.4 133.0 127.5 187.4 > 13.3 <- HE (AS6939) > 184.104.198.147 0.0% 30 142.9 133.9 128.3 144.2 > 5.9 > 72.52.92.106 63.3% 30 196.2 146.5 126.7 199.5 > 31.9 <- HE (AS6939) > 193.27.37.131 30.0% 30 202.8 139.7 129.1 202.8 > 24.9 <- Piter-IX Helsinki > 213.239.224.26 33.3% 30 195.4 136.3 129.1 195.4 > 19.9 <- Hetzner > 213.133.119.11 30.0% 30 196.9 140.4 129.1 199.1 > 24.3 <- Hetzner > [destination] 40.0% 30 196.9 133.2 129.1 196.9 > 15.9 <- Hetzner (endpoint) > > Reproduced against a second, unrelated destination in the same Hetzner > Helsinki range with the > same result (same HE hops, same loss pattern). Reproducible over multiple > runs across several > hours. > > Would appreciate it if anyone from Hurricane Electric's NOC/engineering, or > anyone who can point > me to the right escalation path, could take a look at the segment from > 184.104.192.133 onward > toward the Piter-IX Helsinki peering. Happy to share full raw output, run > tests at a specific time > of your choosing, or provide a looking-glass-reachable source if that helps > triage. > > > Sina Owolabi > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XJO5G3K5QB4UTFHM3MHGXLFNYMHTHXWP/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/W5SFJGZBZUXLHEMTVZHK4W6QS2F7ZYSE/