Re: Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN???s Directory Services)

Alexander Harrowell via NANOG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Message-ID <CA+qGm=9yyR2dFbjWgxMJJgRJUhHck3++YUtLSh6FBJEn6pHJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Also, there are users, who occasionally want to check something and will be
turned away.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 8:54 PM Rich Kulawiec via NANOG <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 07:44:31PM -0400, Shane Ronan via NANOG wrote:
> > Your email says "This transition is an important step toward improving
> > alignment with established IETF standards.", aligning a new feature to a
> > standard doesn't mean shutting down a service that is used in so many
> ways,
> > and expecting users to rely on a service that by your own admission isn't
> > the standard in todays OS deployments.
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to work with the OS community to rdap clients
> > ubiquitous before pushing a sunset of whois?
>
> I strongly concur with this.  There are no doubt a LOT of people who
> have no idea that any of this happening, but who have built extensive
> tooling on top of whois and will not be happy when it all suddenly breaks
> (with whatever operational consequences that implies).
>
> What needs to happen is: (1) the developers of every significant whois
> client need to be notified (2) they need to be convinced to put a notice
> in the client software (3) they need to push a release (4) the release
> needs to be picked up by every significant OS distribution (5) the
> release needs to be adopted by most of the users those OS distributions.
> And then (6) software with equivalent functionality needs to be developed
> and tested and deployed and picked up and so on.  Maybe that means
> modifying what already exists, maybe it means starting over; but whatever
> it is, it needs to be ubiquitous *well before* anyone can even consider
> discussing turning off whois.
>
> That's going to take a long time -- years.  But it needs to be done
> in order to avoid blindsiding a lot of people who've spent years
> (decades) building and relying on whois.
>
> ---rsk
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4EX2LDRHAWP3MDY6HH3HGK5MHKXW47R5/
>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7VJVUBQIKXBJVTKJKSYHWM7UXDZJJ7X2/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.