Re: Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN???s Directory Services)
Alexander Harrowell via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+qGm=9yyR2dFbjWgxMJJgRJUhHck3++YUtLSh6FBJEn6pHJDQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Also, there are users, who occasionally want to check something and will be turned away. On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 8:54 PM Rich Kulawiec via NANOG < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 07:44:31PM -0400, Shane Ronan via NANOG wrote: > > Your email says "This transition is an important step toward improving > > alignment with established IETF standards.", aligning a new feature to a > > standard doesn't mean shutting down a service that is used in so many > ways, > > and expecting users to rely on a service that by your own admission isn't > > the standard in todays OS deployments. > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to work with the OS community to rdap clients > > ubiquitous before pushing a sunset of whois? > > I strongly concur with this. There are no doubt a LOT of people who > have no idea that any of this happening, but who have built extensive > tooling on top of whois and will not be happy when it all suddenly breaks > (with whatever operational consequences that implies). > > What needs to happen is: (1) the developers of every significant whois > client need to be notified (2) they need to be convinced to put a notice > in the client software (3) they need to push a release (4) the release > needs to be picked up by every significant OS distribution (5) the > release needs to be adopted by most of the users those OS distributions. > And then (6) software with equivalent functionality needs to be developed > and tested and deployed and picked up and so on. Maybe that means > modifying what already exists, maybe it means starting over; but whatever > it is, it needs to be ubiquitous *well before* anyone can even consider > discussing turning off whois. > > That's going to take a long time -- years. But it needs to be done > in order to avoid blindsiding a lot of people who've spent years > (decades) building and relying on whois. > > ---rsk > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4EX2LDRHAWP3MDY6HH3HGK5MHKXW47R5/ > _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7VJVUBQIKXBJVTKJKSYHWM7UXDZJJ7X2/