Re: Using Cloudflare after Christchurch

InternetNZ is the forum to discuss this, not NZNOG.

But first, spend some time here:
https://www.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-criticism/

On Thu, 2 May 2019, 09:54 Peter Lambrechtsen, <peter-EdtBLS/20/[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think this question has been asked but I think it's worth asking.
>
> After the Christchurch attacks and the fact that Cloudflare clearly
> support terrorist and white supremacist sites has there been any
> consideration on if peering or engaging with Cloudflare is something that
> providers no longer wish to participate in.
>
> Or there isn't a sense of morality when it comes to the internet.
>
> Cloudflare have a LONG history of not caring about any and all vile
> material and have absolutely no intention to do anything about it from the
> engagements I have had with them post Christchurch.
>
>
> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/cloudflare-changes-abuse-policy-but-refuses-to-censor-the-internet/
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/19/cloudflare_terror_groups/
> https://suespammers.net/tag/cloudflare-com-doing-nothing-about-spam-abuse/
> https://krebsonsecurity.com/tag/cloudflare/
>
> https://www.propublica.org/article/how-cloudflare-helps-serve-up-hate-on-the-web
>
> To me they are clearly supportive of all sorts of vile content and have
> zero interest in doing anything about it while they still earn money.
>
> Has the horrific events of Christchurch given anyone pause to think if
> they want to engage with Cloudflare?
>
> Are morals important when running a service?.
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> NZNOG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog