Re: 2019 BGP router recommendations
"Tony Wicks" <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:15:41 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nznog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============1273779572== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0103_01D54EAC.29D60150" Content-Language: en-nz This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01D54EAC.29D60150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MX150 will handle a few full tables no problem, now if it only had more = than one power supply=E2=80=A6. It is a very attractive price for what = you get however. =20 From: [email protected] = <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Phil Snowdon Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 11:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [nznog] 2019 BGP router recommendations =20 Hi All, =20 Looking for some recommendations for BGP edge routers. =20 Have used Juniper devices for years, but interested to hear what else = may be out there. Requirement is just to shift packets and multihome to = a few upstream transit providers with full routing tables and several = peering partners with more limited route table sizes. Traffic volumes = in the gigs to low 10's of gigs. =20 I seem to be getting into a situation where the high end boxes to cope = with routing table sizes are overkill in terms of features and = performance (and price). But match performance and there's not enough = memory to run the BGP. =20 Prefer a supported vendor device rather than roll your own open source = solution. =20 =20 Thanks =20 Phil ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01D54EAC.29D60150 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta = http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><meta = name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered = medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:#0563C1; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:#954F72; text-decoration:underline;} p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0 {mso-style-name:msonormal; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;} span.EmailStyle18 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:windowtext;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-NZ = link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1><p = class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>MX150 will = handle a few full tables no problem, now if it only had more than one = power supply=E2=80=A6. It is a very attractive price for what you get = however.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal><b><span lang=3DEN-US>From:</span></b><span = lang=3DEN-US> [email protected] = <[email protected]> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Phil = Snowdon<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, 9 August 2019 11:17 AM<br><b>To:</b> = [email protected]<br><b>Subject:</b> [nznog] 2019 BGP router = recommendations<o:p></o:p></span></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>Hi = All,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Looking for some recommendations for BGP edge = routers.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Have used Juniper devices for years, but interested to = hear what else may be out there. Requirement is just to shift = packets and multihome to a few upstream transit providers with full = routing tables and several peering partners with more limited route = table sizes. Traffic volumes in the gigs to low 10's of = gigs.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>I = seem to be getting into a situation where the high end boxes to cope = with routing table sizes are overkill in terms of features and = performance (and price). But match performance and there's = not enough memory to run the BGP.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Prefer a supported vendor device rather than roll your = own open source solution.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Thanks<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Phil<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html> ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01D54EAC.29D60150-- --===============1273779572== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list [email protected] https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog --===============1273779572==--