Re: Transit SLA
"Jere Retzer" <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:08:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=_A9F78E93.8AE98CA7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy wrote: >>I have been trying to purchase transit across AMS-IX from a number of = different European ISPs. One ISP (BT Ignite) will not sell transit across the EP due to a lack of control of the SLA. =20 Does anyone have examples of ISP SLAs, ideally "de-identified" that they = are willing to share with the list? I would think that these would caveat = service with something like "excluding outages for customer owned or = leased equipment and/or telecommunications circuits." That being the case, = if it is then the EP would be in the excluded category from a provider = perspective. Make sense?=20 Thanks to all for the great comments/ideas Jere --=_A9F78E93.8AE98CA7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"= > <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4727.700" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 12pt Verdana; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px"> <DIV><BR><BR>Andy wrote:<BR><BR>>>I have been trying to purchase = transit=20 across AMS-IX from a number of different European ISPs. One ISP = (BT=20 Ignite) will not sell transit<BR>across the EP due to a lack of control of = the=20 SLA. <BR><BR>Does anyone have examples of ISP SLAs, ideally=20 "de-identified" that they are willing to share with the list? I would = think=20 that these would caveat service with something like "excluding outages = for=20 customer owned or leased equipment and/or telecommunications circuits." = That=20 being the case, if it is then the EP would be in the excluded category = from a=20 provider perspective. Make sense? </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks to all for the great comments/ideas</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Jere</DIV></BODY></HTML> --=_A9F78E93.8AE98CA7--