Re: Future Internet Distribution Chain
Dave Siegel <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:03:28 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > What do backbone networks think about exchanges being used in this manner? I'm fine with it, but dislike it when the operators violate RFC's by stripping their own AS out of the AS path. > Given the tremendous drop in bulk Internet transit prices over the past few years, local peering has lost quite a bit of economic value from the local network perspective. Given that the major networks can peer with one another where ever they want, I am beginning to wonder how much pricing leverage even a Equinix or a MAE has to extract fees (from the majors). That means that REPs probably need other revenue sources and wholesale distribution certainly seems a strong candidate. Comments? Everyone is feeling huge price pressure. There is just too much competition. As far as Equinix goes, we seem to move into a new Equinix at regular intervals to get access to more carrier customers opportunities, so they continue to get additional revenue from us for colo, power, and x-connects. -- Dave Siegel http://www.siegelie.com/people/dsiegel/ Oro Valley, AZ Gardening Rule: When weeding, the best way to make sure you are removing a weed and not a valuable plant is to pull on it. If it comes out of the ground easily, it is a valuable plant.