Re: [apnic-talk] Issue with ISC F root IPv6 routing in Chennai
Anurag Bhatia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.sanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ0+aXaC0sJSR=sV9saXatLZ-5SvvBoKvO3UtRMqW=-NkEcXgw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Sunny Thanks for the message. While no one from ISC replied, I see they have acted by withdrawing announcements. 2001:de8:1:2::3 24049 ESTAB 35d22h56m 0 0 2314 0 2001:de8:1:2::4 24049 ESTAB 136d14h17m 0 0 2314 0 I hope ISC has an arrangement on IPv6 transit at NIXI (just like they would have for IPv4) since people around routes partially at NIXI to balance off traffic. On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Srinivas Chendi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anurag > > Forwarded your email to ISC team. Hope they will look into this soon. > > Sunny > > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Anurag Bhatia <[email protected]> > Date: 24/06/2017 21:53 (GMT+10:00) > To: SANOG <[email protected]>, mailman_APNIC-talk <[email protected]> > Subject: [apnic-talk] Issue with ISC F root IPv6 routing in Chennai > > Hello, > > > > Anyone here from NIXI or ISC? > > > I see there's a consistent issue with IPv6 for F root anycast instance in > Chennai hosted at NIXI - *2001:500:2f::f* > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > > > > > > If I trace it from the RIPE Atlas anchor, I get following: > > Probe #6107 > > 1 2401:7500:fff0:1::1 0.838 ms 0.747 ms > 0.632 ms > 2 2400:5200:1c00:d::1 1.755 ms 1.745 ms > 1.726 ms > 3 2403:0:100::2be 2.089 ms 2.054 ms > 2.049 ms > 4 2404:a800:2a00::13d 45.589 ms 26.274 ms > 33.64 ms > 5 2404:a800::178 26.376 ms 25.406 ms > 25.276 ms > 6 2001:de8:1:2::3 25.363 ms 25.232 ms > 25.223 ms > 7 * * * > * > 8 * * * > * > 9 * * * > * > 10 * * * > * > 11 * * * > * > > > > > 6th hop is ISC's router on NIXI Chennai peering fabric > (2001:de8:1:2::/64). Clearly, there's an issue in return path and possibly > setup is either without default or misconfigured IPv6 or partial table. > > > > > > > on "sh bgp ipv6 sum" on NIXI Chennai route server, it gives: > > 2001:de8:1:2::3 24049 ESTAB 25d 3h10m 1 0 > 2263 0 > 2001:de8:1:2::4 24049 ESTAB 125d18h30m 1 0 > 2264 0 > > > > > > show ipv6 bgp neighbors 2001:de8:1:2::3 received-routes > There are 1 received routes from neighbor 2001:de8:1:2::3 > Searching for matching routes, use ^C to quit... > Status A:AGGREGATE B:BEST b:NOT-INSTALLED-BEST C:CONFED_EBGP D:DAMPED > E:EBGP H:HISTORY I:IBGP L:LOCAL M:MULTIPATH > m:NOT-INSTALLED-MULTIPATH > S:SUPPRESSED F:FILTERED s:STALE > Prefix Next Hop MED LocPrf Weight > Status > 1 2001:500:2f::/48 2001:de8:1:2::3 10 100 0 BE > > AS_PATH: 24049 3557 > > > show ipv6 bgp neighbors 2001:de8:1:2::4 received-routes > There are 1 received routes from neighbor 2001:de8:1:2::4 > Searching for matching routes, use ^C to quit... > Status A:AGGREGATE B:BEST b:NOT-INSTALLED-BEST C:CONFED_EBGP D:DAMPED > E:EBGP H:HISTORY I:IBGP L:LOCAL M:MULTIPATH > m:NOT-INSTALLED-MULTIPATH > S:SUPPRESSED F:FILTERED s:STALE > Prefix Next Hop MED LocPrf Weight > Status > 1 2001:500:2f::/48 2001:de8:1:2::4 10 100 0 E > > AS_PATH: 24049 3557 > > > > > > > One should possible stop this BGP announcement until return path issue is > fixed. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > > Anurag Bhatia > anuragbhatia.com > -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com _______________________________________________ sanog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog
Screen Shot 2017-06-24 at 5.10.49 PM.png
(image/png, 40.8 KB) - not displayed