Re: Bind9 9.9.5 memory exhaustion attack?
Andreas Fink <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.swinog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The permuted case serves a well documented purpose and will not generate duplicate cache entries. See this document explaining it: https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/20/session/2/contribution/12/material/slides/0.pdf <https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/20/session/2/contribution/12/material/slides/0.pdf> Andreas Fink Fink Telecom Services, Rackbone.ch, Cajutel.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Mail: [email protected] www.fink-telecom.com www.rackbone.ch www.cajutel.com Mobile: +41-78-6677333 Skype: andreasfink Jabber/XMPP: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > On 4 Feb 2017, at 11:03, Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello All > > Anyone else running bind9 and seeing a lot of request with permuted > case in the requested resource, which I fear causes bind9 to cache > each reply individually leading to memory exhaustion? > > -Benoît- > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog