Re: RIPE database and more specific routes
"Scott Weeks" <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:13:57 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.swinog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
: But I am concerned some people may build filters using : only exact matches, so it seems safer to have route : objects for more specifics. :: I´d suggest to create each route object for each :: announced prefix...IMHO you are very right - there are :: for sure networks out there, which will filter your :: prefixes, when you do not have a matching route object :: entry ... That seems painful when fast action is required. Say you have a /16 and someone is hijacking a /23 withing it. Before mitigating damage by announcing the two /24s you'd have to update the registry and wait for the upstream to accept it? Do you just preregister all the /24, /23, /22, etc prefix combinations in advance? scott _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog