Re: [Sum] Contacts Design

Hi Davor,

You may be thinking of the GTD triage status of "Waiting for". My
interpretation is that it is a type of Later. If I mark an item with
"Waiting for", in theory I know what I'm waiting for to be able to take
the next action step, Later. If and when custom triage status and
sections become available, I will implement Waiting for immediately.
IMO, since Chandler is designed with GTD as one of its conceptual
sources, I think Waiting for should be an OOTB triage status. This could
also draw more user adoption of those using GTD. 

Enjoy, Andre 

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:05:36 -0700, "Davor Cubranic"
<[email protected]> said:
> On Thursday 05 July 2007 04:57:43 Mimi Yin wrote:
> > Would it make sense to add a 4th triage status for something along
> > the lines of Archive?
> 
> Isn't there a triage status in GTD named "Get to it"? (It's been a while 
> since I skimmed the book.) Although, I guess it works sort of like 
> Chandler's "Later" without an alarm. Plus there is the "Reference 
> file", which sounds like the "Archive" status for contacts that you 
> mentioned.
> 
> Davor
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design