Re: [Please Review] Chandler.po

Mimi Yin wrote:
> You have seen this certificate before. You fiddled with some levers
> which ended up putting this certificate in the not-trust pile. But you
> probably didn't know what you were doing it...so here it is again. Do
> you trust it or not?
> 
> Is that accurate? I'm not proposing that as the message, just trying to
> get the story straight.

That about sums it, yes.

> A different way to approach this: Is it important for the user to know
> that the certificate is already known? Could we just gloss over that
> part? Or, what's the significance of being already known? It seems like
> the user barely knows of its existence.

I think it does have some significance. The user had to do something
earlier to get the certificate into the repository. That is different
from seeing something for the first time.

> So is the issuer the server you're trying to connect with? Can we say:
> *'Cannot get certificate from server or new server.'*

No, and no. I'd just rather keep the message as is.

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGk80yb8x8KoP+JuwRAoDnAJ91+mmwYralKL8oGYW9vReswMrqtQCfQ64K
mI0M5/Gu2MQoEcisoGCFK7U=
=+NYD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----