RE: Some feedback from a new user

"Robin Cottiss" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.design
Message-ID <026401c7ef56$ecbaf5d0$c630e170$@com>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>Mimi Yin
>Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:48 AM
>To: Design Discussions
>Subject: Re: [Design] Some feedback from a new user
>
>Visual clutter is definitely an issue. One design that we considered
>and punted to future is to dynamically label just the TOP hour slot
>with AM/PM. So for example, if you've scrolled the calendar so that 3
>in the afternoon is at the top, it should say 3PM at the top.
>
[Robin Cottiss] 
Yes that works. But I would still like the label to show a time. 2:00 etc. 2 is just a number it is
not a time.
>On Aug 29, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Robin Cottiss wrote:
>
>>>>> [Jeffrey:]
>>>>> Personally, I find the repeated AM/PM to be visual clutter, but
>>>>> I'll
>>>>> confess I also occasionally get confused about whether I'm
>>>>> looking at
>>>>> AM or PM, so I agree that the desktop certainly doesn't have it
>>>>> right
>>>>> yet.  I wonder if there's some out-of-the box way to avoid
>>>>> confusion
>>>>> without repeating AM/PM?
>>>>
>>>> How about some shading or gradient in the time panel?
>>>
>>> It is there, sort of: the work hours (9-5) have a darker left-hand
>>> border. If this is extended to add shading to the entire background,
>>> then I think that:
>>>
>>>  1. it should distinguish working and non-working hours, not am/pm
>>>  2. non-working hours should be in a darker shade
>>>
>>> Incidentally, this is how Outlook does it. But I'm happy with the
>>> current design, personally. More importantly, extensive shading might
>>> clash with Chandler mostly-white look, as opposed to Outlook's
>>> heavy use
>>> of blues and yellows.
>>>
>>> Davor
>> [Robin Cottiss]
>> I Just looked at Outlook 2007 and it denotes am/pm on the 1st time
>> slot that
>> is visible ad dynamically updates as you scroll! It also always has
>> noon as
>> 12pm. I am not sure about using the working hours to give the am/pm
>> context.
>> That would be asking your brain to do quite a lot! Suppose the view
>> I have
>> is all workday (so I do not see the boundaries). My brain has to
>> know that
>> the darker (or is it lighter?) shade/color is the workday then
>> translate
>> that into am/pm. You can tell the Outlook team had this issue as
>> they have
>> done a lot of work to address it. I cannot remember what previous
>> versions
>> of Outlook did but I am sure the am/pm context was not difficult to
>> decode.
>>
>> Robin
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
>Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.