Re: Who are tasks assigned to in Chandler?

Jeffrey Harris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Mimi,

> For items that start out as emails, we could automatically change the
> To: field to become 'Assigned to:'  when users stamp those emails as Tasks.

Sounds good, is there a bug to track this overall concept of spiffing up
task + mail?  Or maybe we don't have a clear enough plan yet.

> I think these 2 features would help users 'discover' addressing as a way
> of assigning tasks. A way to show/hide the cc and bcc fields would help
> too. They scream email to users and help to squash any inkling that the
> addressing fields could be used for anything other than addressing
> communications.

The From: field also doesn't have an obvious analog in a task-centric
world.  Maybe we could relabel From: -> Assigned-by:?

How about this:  If a message also has the task stamp, we
- rename To -> assigned-to,
- rename From -> assigned-by,
- hide assigned-by if it matches assigned-to
- hide any other messaging fields that are empty
- add a [More/Less] button to show all the hidden fields

Also, now that we're pursuing task management, I've noticed various
problems with the mail stamp in the dashboard:

- In the Chandler Evangelism collection, everyone's tasks show up as
being from me (filed bug 11027)
- The draft icon for task-messages seems inappropriate and distracting;
I'm never planning on sending emails about the task, it's just an
assigned task.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.