Re: [Cosmo] Automatic restoration of published shares

Okay,

Are we all in agreement that we should move to a model where there  
can only be 1 r/w and 1 r-only ticket per collection at any given  
time? That seems to be bcm's condition for having the server create  
the tickets for the default Hub collection.

Mimi

On Oct 16, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:

> Well, I was hoping that the server would do it.  I agree with you that
> the web ui user should be able to share the default collection without
> going into the account browser to create tickets by hand, which
> implies the client can't really be the one responsible for creating
> those tickets.
>
> On 10/16/07, Mimi Yin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Morgen,
>>
>> Should the Desktop create tickets for the default Hub collection?
>>
>> Mimi
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/10/07, Mimi Yin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason not to? I think for 1.0, Hub users should be able
>>>> to send out tickets to invite others to share the way Desktop users
>>>> can. So perhaps generating tickets for the default collection  
>>>> should
>>>> be a part of that?
>>>
>>> sure, but it only really makes sense if we move to the "one set of
>>> tickets" model that we've discussed before.
>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>
>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
>>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design