Re: Re: Triage Sort in the NOW sections
Mimi Yin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Seems like we're mostly on the same page about sorting in the LATER section, but still not settle on the issue of sorting in the NOW section. The 2 options we've discussed thus far for improving sorting in the NOW section are: 1. Explicit ordering in the NOW section? versus 2. Auto-sorting items in the NOW section by the Date column (a la LATER section) while keeping 'new, unread' items at the top. It seems to me that if you had a small NOW section, you would prefer 1. If you had a large NOW section, you'd prefer 2. Bryan, do you have any questions/insights re: implementation? Mimi On Oct 19, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Mimi Yin wrote: > OR We *could* auto-sort the NOW section in the same way we're > proposing to sort the LATER section with the caveat that 'newly > arrived items' stay at the top until the user has read them and > clicked the Triage button in the toolbar. Does that make sense? My > concern is that if we move to an auto-sort paradigm in the NOW > section, new items that arrive in the NOW section will never catch > your attention because they get 'auto-sorted' down the list of NOW > items. > > Mimi _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design