Re: Re: [Cosmo] [Proposal] Re-haul of Collection Details Dialog

On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On Nov 13, 2007 12:47 PM, Mimi Yin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ===
>> Tab: Subscribe
>> -----
>>
>>   Subscribe with:  [ Chandler Desktop | v ]
>>  Apple iCal 2.x
>>  Apple iCal 3.x
>>  Feed Reader
>>  Other
>
> for reasons i've already described, there should not be any
> distinction between versions of iCal.

bcm, where can I find your reasoning for this? I haven't been  
following all the various iCal 3 threads closely enough.

>> ===
>> Tab: Share
>> -----
>> Give out the URL(s) below to invite others to subscribe:
>>
>>  View-only: http://hub.chandlerproject.org/xxxxx <LINK>
>>   View and Edit: http: //hub.chandlerproject.org/xxxxx <LINK>
>
> this implies that tickets are automatically created when a collection
> is created. this is true when a collection is created with Morse Code
> (i.e. by Desktop), but it's not true when somebody creates a
> collection through the web UI or DAV (iCal, command line). i don't
> have any problem making that happen, though.

Yea, if there are no objections, I think it'll be simpler if we can  
keep it all consistent. I've logged a bug for that: https:// 
bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design