Re: [Proposal] What is Chandler supposed to do anyway?
D John Anderson <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:25:24 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 9, 2007, at 3:04 AM, hank williams wrote: >> What I would suggest is that the actual verbs associated with >> collections be placed next to the collections. This might be a pop up >> menu knob associated with each collection in the sidebar. You click >> on >> this and get a drop down of sharing and other option like delete, >> etc. >> The idea is to make it clear that there are things that you can do to >> collections, and what they are. >> > +1 The current design tries to pack too much UI information into too small a space. The check mark is both more obvious to the user and much simpler to implement. > The current overlay checkboxes next to the collections are nice, but > they are so cute that they are not obvious. I would suggest a more > traditional looking checkbox i.e. google calendar (though ideally not > as plain looking as gCal). Similarly, for this drop down menu feature, > the idea that there is something clickable has to have incredibly > strong visual cues. As with everything, it needs to be artistic, but > not at all subtle. > > If necessary, to support being visually obvious, using slightly more > horizontal or vertical space as the default for collections is not a > bad thing. The standard display today is >1000 pixels, and collections > are the anchor of chandler, so making this area highly attention > getting and obvious in every way would be well worth it. > > Oh, and one more thing. The collections area should be labeled above. > If you are going to introduce new nomenclature you need to support it > strongly. Labeling the area is helpful, along with a rollover on the > word that helps explain it. As I see it, you have: > > in > out > trash, > show all > (and potentially show items in no collection, though this doesnt > seem possible now) > > Then you have a separate area labeled collections and you have your > colored collections, i.e. > > COLLECTIONS > fun > work > personal > etc. > > > Oh, one more thing. I havent said anything positive yet. Here goes. > > This software is usable now. It just needs to polish these UI things > and you really have a product. The only bad thing is that people are > now so web focused that chandler hub is going to become the preferred > tool to use and so it needs to be as cool as chandler is. But I am > officially going to try using chandler as a task management tool for > me and my team. We will see how that goes. > > > Hank > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design