Re: [Proposal] What is Chandler supposed to do anyway?

D John Anderson wrote:
> The only downside that I've heard mentioned to it is that it takes more
> screen real estate to implement two separate controls instead of one and
> sometimes requires an extra step to get where you want to go. Our simple
> tool bar buttons don't extend easily to many new filters or display
> types, so you'd probably have to go with something open ended like a
> drop down list.

This resonates with me as well, I've been somewhat uncomfortable with
how things are but haven't really thought much beyond that. Separating
view and filter makes sense to me.

Also, I like the idea of putting a separate toolbar for the table view
("table toolbar"). The way I see it, the current All, Mail, Tasks,
Calendar buttons could become two: Table and Calendar. And the Table
Toolbar would have Task, Event, Mail and Note filters that you could
select singly or in any combination. Heck, if you wanted to go fancy you
could create and apply custom filters.

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHXXglb8x8KoP+JuwRAqbvAKCoDwC9+Yk1dBDDA6u0bfSaNUif5wCgmCWv
gbguZDjhpk3TEM5B1ytmi3k=
=ql36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----