Re: [Proposal] What is Chandler supposed to do anyway?
D John Anderson <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:42:28 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Hank's assessment of the importance of this issue as a priority for 1.0. On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:10 PM, hank williams wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 4:33 PM, Mimi Yin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just to clarify: There is no design argument against separating >> application areas and views. It's more a matter of implementing the >> UI elements needed to do this in a way that doesn't visually >> overwhelm the interface. (Something we're already struggling with.) > > Indeed this is always a struggle. But the number one issue is > understanding the data model. I do believe it is possible to fix this > issue without overwhelming. Indeed some of the things you have already > suggested, like removing all those mail icons, helps enormously. My > suggestions help lighten the menu bar - which will be lighter anyway > without the utility menus. > >> The decision to combine app areas + filter functionality boiled down >> to prioritization. (In the Chandler Hub UI, we have a different take >> on this problem. We *only* have views, no application areas.) We >> should revisit this issue in the context of our post 1.0 plans. >> > > I don't have any insight into what the difficulties are in making > various changes or your roadmap plans. But in my view, the way that > views currently work is so confusing that I think you will loose well > more than 50% of your potential users because they do not understand. > I say that only because, after spending many hours over the weekend > with the software I am still not entirely clear how the views and > filtering works. And I figure if that is the case with me, casual > users will, for the most part, give up. > > I therefore suggest that this issue be a priority for 1.0 because, as > humbly as I can suggest this, if I am confused, precious few will not > be. > > You are so close to something that really is a friendly piece of > software. I'd just love to see you guys make it over the usability > finish line. > > Hank > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design