Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple

Mimi Yin <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:54:17 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi bcm,

My understanding is that the current plan of record for Cosmo doesn't  
really include a particular 1.0 target. Instead, there are 5  
milestones defined around usage scenarios.

Resolving the 'read-only' security hole however *is* something that  
the server and desktop will need to coordinate in time for the  
Desktop 1.0 release.

 From http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-December/ 
008051.html
> Our thinking about the evolution of the Server (Cosmo) is a bit   
> different than for the Desktop. Instead of focusing on some kind of
> concrete 1.0 goal it's easier to plan the Server around a number  
> of  end-user milestones. Keep in mind these are end-user milestones  
> only and we defer to Ted to fill in the details for any  
> architectural or development objectives as well.
>
> Milestones:
>
> 1. Make a good 30-second impression for people "checking out"
> Chandler Project.
>
> 2. Family can use Chandler Hub calendar together.
>
> 3. Casual Collaborator for Desktop user.
>
> 4. Family can use Chandler Hub calendar + tasks together.
>
> 5. Remote Desktop user.


Mimi

On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On Dec 18, 2007 4:26 PM, Mimi Yin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It's a Desktop date bcm.
>
> something tells me that we aren't going to release a 1.0 of the
> desktop without a 1.0 of the server.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design