Re: [Chandler-dev] Suggestion - Raise priority of implementing VJOURNAL import/export
Mimi Yin <mimi-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Indeed, there are 2 bugs. ! for import/export on Desktop. The 2nd for syncing via Hub. https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11922 https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12037 Both slated for 1.0 On May 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Jeffrey Harris wrote: > Hi Andre, > >> However, this is not the case. It appears VJOURNAL export, and I >> assume VJOURNAL import, are not implemented (yet). What remains >> implemented is VEVENTS and VTODO. > > I think we've discussed exporting all notes as VTODOs, continuing > the recent theme that it's hard to distinguish notes from tasks. I > think Mimi even filed a bug for it. > > In any case, I agree that we need to export notes, not just leave > them by the wayside. > > Sincerely, > Jeffrey > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev