Re: [Chandler-dev] [Proposal] Assigning an "Owner" to an item

Yea pretty much. Heh, doesn't sound like that much work, right? ;)

On May 16, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:

> Hi Mimi,
>
>> The "Owner" wouldn't change. It's just that the Who-column should  
>> temporarily display who last edited,sent or updated an item so  
>> long as the item is marked Unread. If the item has an Owner, then  
>> the Who column should go back to displaying the Owner attribute as  
>> soon as it is marked "Read".
>> So it would look something like this:
>> *Who Column*
>> own Mimi --> Andre edits the item and it is marked Unread for me
>> ed Andre --> I click on item to see Andre's edits and item is  
>> marked Read for me
>> own Mimi
>
> So, my way of thinking about this (if I got it right) is, in the  
> who column:
>
> - When a message is unread, everything acts the way it does now
> - When a message is read, Owner takes precedence, if their is one
>
> Beyond that, we're just adding a new field that defaults to empty.
>
> Is that right?  Sounds good to me.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jeffrey
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev