Re: [Chandler-dev] Can we change the When column behavior for events with alarms?

Jeffrey Harris <jeffrey-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Mimi,

> I've been mulling over this one too for a while. I think the problem I'm 
> blocked on is, if/when we sort the LATER section correctly (meaning 
> sub-sorted by Date), how should an event with a custom tickler alarm be 
> sorted?
> 
> For example, should the July 4th wedding appear after items set for July 
> 3rd and before items set for July 5th? Or should it appear amongst the 
> late June items?
> 
> (I have been assuming that it would appear amongst the late June items, 
> the use case being: I'm scanning my LATER section to see what's coming 
> up just over the horizon.)

In the long term, I think we *definitely* want a quick and easy way to 
spawn a linked item, which can appear separately, at a different time, 
in the list view.

In the short term, since we're not doing that right now, I'd like to go 
for the simpler approach:  If it's a future event with an earlier alarm, 
ignore the alarm for sorting/display purposes.

I know that by doing this we'd lose the ability to scan quickly for the 
do-subtask-implied-by-alarm workflow, but it's not like the information 
is gone.  It'll still pop-to-now on time, and I can select the event to 
look at the alarm.

The win of simplifying the mental model for beginning users just seems a 
lot bigger than the utility of scan-for-next-alarm-on-event, it seems to 
me.  And note that we'd only lose scanning for alarms on events, alarm 
dates for non-events would continue to be listed.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.