Re: [Chandler-dev] Regarding the plugin architecture stability

At 05:39 PM 5/31/2008 -0300, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>Hello,
>
>As some of you might already know, I would like to develop a simple 
>plugin to augment some aspects of Chandler in order to better 
>support the GTD methodology.
>
>You guys have been doing an awesome work in the latest months, and 
>Chandler has been evolving form an almost unusable piece of software 
>(no offernse, but indeed, there was a time, not so long ago, that 
>Chandler was merely a kind of prototype or proof-of-concept and not 
>really a productivity tool ready for the prime time) to a really 
>great tool and PIM framework, so, congrats and keep up the great work.
>
>What I would like to know is if the plugin architecture is mature 
>enough for serious work. I don't want to develop something for a 
>version and suddenly have the whole thing break in a later revision.

I'd describe the plugin architecture as "stable" rather than 
"mature".  :)  But we don't have any plans for any significant 
changes at any time through the 1.0 release.  If there are any 
changes, they will be for 2.0 and beyond.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev