Re: [Chandler-dev] Too many dialogs

Grant Baillie <grant-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11 Jun, 2008, at 10:56, Mimi Yin wrote:

> That's a good example of our "too many dialogs" problem Keith. I've  
> logged a bug to track this category of problems.
>
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12147

Specific to this case, both "compact" and "check for updates" will  
currently set themselves to run a week after you launch a new version  
of Chandler, so they end up running very close to one another.

In general, wx doesn't seem quite on the ball about the interaction  
between window modality and level (Z-order). So, it seems quite happy  
to put non-modal windows above modal ones, which isn't really an  
optimal user experience. Hopefully, there is a way around this.

--Grant

> On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Keith Winsor wrote:
>
>> Not strictly a response to this, but an observation...
>>
>> I've just come back from a week's holiday and opened up Chandler on  
>> my 'big' PC (XP, 3.4 GHz dual core, 4Gb RAM: should have enough  
>> resources for Chandler ;-) ). After a normal start-up, I got  
>> simultaneously an event alarm, an 'update is available' pop-up and  
>> a 'Chandler needs to compact the repository' dialogue box.  
>> Unfortunately, it couldn't seem to decide which one had the focus,  
>> and ignored any attempt to OK or cancel the messages. In the end I  
>> walked away after five minutes and, an hour later, normal service  
>> had resumed.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.