Re: [Chandler-dev] Bug fixes to consider putting in 1.0

FWIW, I've r+'ed Jeffrey's fixes to 12262 and 12256: They should go in  
1.0 along with the "repository in use" auto-reload bug on Windows. rc2  
anyone?

--Grant

On 30 Jul, 2008, at 16:23, Jeffrey Harris wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> With Grant returning tomorrow, I wanted to start a conversation  
> about whether we should spin a 1.0rc2, and what bug fixes should go  
> in.
>
> Sheila mentioned that she'd like Grant to make the decision about  
> what's safe to go in and what's not, which sounds good to me.
>
> I do think we probably should spin an rc2, although I know we'd  
> really like to ship 1.0.  Here are my nominations for fixes to put in:
>
>
> Outlook fix - https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12262
>
> Emails from Chandler with empty bodies are, in some variety of  
> Microsoft mail clients, displaying our theoretically hidden EIM  
> payload.  This isn't a big deal but it's ugly, and the fix is a very  
> safe addition of a bit of whitespace.
>
>
> URL fix - https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12256
>
> The recent URL detection code didn't work with URLs that stretched  
> over multiple lines.  My fix to find multi-line-URLs unfortunately  
> has a flaw: if a URL appears on the first line, all whitespace after  
> the item body is seen as matching that first line, which makes for a  
> disconcertingly large click target for that url (and makes it hard  
> to edit the body if it happens to contain just a url and nothing  
> else).
>
> This is also only a minor annoyance, but a very safe fix.
>
> ...
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev