Re: [Chandler-dev] State of Chandler Calendar Interop

On Sep 12, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> A number of calendar interop issues have come up recently and I'm  
> wondering if we want to do a quick review of "The State of Chandler  
> Calendar Interoperation".
>
> These are the 4 issues I'm aware of. What am I missing. Jeffrey,  
> when you say that CalDAV isn't really working with iCal, do you mean  
> Apple's CalDAV server? or Apple iCal users subscribing via CalDAV to  
> Chandler Hub collections?
>
> Also, I remember there was an issue that we were trying to get Apple  
> (Morgen) to look into, but I couldn't find it.

I don't think Morgen ever got back to us but we sent him the stuff he  
needed, right Jeffrey? I know there was a bug for this but I can't  
find the  bug number.

>
> Mimi
>
> ***
>
> UTC is not being displayed correctly
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5653
>
> - A number of people have reported this. But it's still unclear to  
> me which calendar clients store their events in UTC. Curiously, the  
> most recent report came from someone subscribing to a Google  
> calendar. I was able to repro the problem (Google calendar events  
> showed up in GMT, even though the calendar on Google is in PST.)  
> However, user replied that the problem went away after a few days!
>
> Google and Apple don't inherit to modifications
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
> - The user impact of this bug sounds pretty serious. However, we  
> haven't heard complaints about it...yet. (It only affects people  
> subscribing to Chandler calendars from Google and Apple iCal, not  
> vice versa.)
>
> Tolerate all-day EXDATE/ RDATE when dtstart is a timed event
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12360
> - This is for Palm calendars only? but essentially any Palm calendar  
> with recurrence will barf in Chandler?
>
> Support Google's CalDAV implementation
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12278
> - Google Calendar comes up a lot. Obviously supporting read-write  
> well would be a big boon. Jeffrey is this something we could try to  
> build volunteer interest around? What's left to do?
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev