Re: OSAF redirect
Katie Capps Parlante <capps-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]> Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:06:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mikeal Rogers wrote: > We can change the page title to something like "OSAF -- Home of Chandler > Project". And make half of the osafoundation.org page a large image link > to chandlerproject -- something nice looking like the one on mozilla.org. Not a bad idea. > If people don't click on the link then I really doubt they would have > clicked on the link to visit hub or downloaded Chandler Desktop so we > didn't actually lose any users and we keep our page rank. I think people don't click on the link because they don't see it. Thought process: "I'm looking for this chandler thing because I've heard it is interesting, but I seem to have found some non-profit software organization, oh well, on to next interesting thing." It is just a theory, but I've seen this happen when looking over people's shoulders. We could test the theory of course. > All of these people who aren't going from osafoundation.org to > chandlerproject.org, are they deciding they don't want to check out the > product for some reason? Did they click on the link in the blog just to > check out organzation/product but not download it ( I do this all the > time by the way )? The redirect doesn't help us get them as users and > does drop our page rank. If we have *one* chance to communicate information about what Chandler is, we want the material on chandlerproject.org, not osafoundation.org. Even if it doesn't lead to a download that visit, we've sent the message that we want. That said, I agree that dropping our page rank is probably a mistake. Cheers, Katie _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general