Re: Relicensing of Chandler source code

"Phillip J. Eby" <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
At 06:05 PM 5/2/2006 -0700, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>If we use the apache 2.0 license, which is incompatible with the GPL,
>wouldn't we then be restricting parcel developers from using the GPL
>if they did wish to do so?

Why would Chandler's (non-viral) license stop anyone from licensing their 
parcel under whatever license they want?  (Including a closed-source 
commercial license, if they so choose.)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.