Re: Relicensing of Chandler source code

Hi Folks,

>> Which projects are currently licensed under the MIT license? Should we
>> consider licensing them under the Apache 2.0 license as well?
> 
> pyLucene, pyICU, and Zanshin are licensed under the MIT License, and
> vobject is licensed under Apache 1.1
> 
> I'm less worried about the licensing of pyLucene and pyICU, since they
> are mostly wrappers, and I am unconcerned about the patent protection
> clauses for zanshin and vObject.  Relicensing to Apache 2.0 makes sense
> from a consistency point of view.  I'd point out that Jeffrey has the
> final say on the vobject license, as he's the primary author.

I find the perceived GPL incompatibility issues very confusing.  Because
patent protection didn't seem particularly pertinent to vobject, I chose
Apache 1.1 for it.  I have no objection to Apache 2.0, I agree it would
be nice to have consistency, as long as no one ends up with the
impression they they can't use it in their GPL project.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general